Our website uses cookies to enhance and personalize your experience and to display advertisements (if any). Our website may also include third party cookies such as Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click the button to view our Privacy Policy.

How technology firms cope with the economic shifts due to tariffs

https://images.mktw.net/im-09636419?width=1260&height=863

The continuous trade disputes between the United States and China have created substantial strains on American tech enterprises, compelling them to adjust to unforeseen financial hurdles. The latest tariff hikes by President Donald Trump’s administration have altered the fiscal landscape for companies dependent on Chinese production. For numerous technology firms, these measures have resulted in heightened expenses, interrupted supply networks, and greater unpredictability, leaving the industry in a vulnerable state.

Deena Ghazarian, who established Austere, an electronics firm located in California, felt the impact of these shifts directly. Not long after starting her company in 2019, she was confronted with an unexpected 25% tariff on the premium audio and video accessories imported from China. The business, which showed initial promise, rapidly became a financial challenge. The new expenses, absent before, jeopardized the company’s viability.

Deena Ghazarian, founder of the California-based electronics company Austere, experienced the brunt of these changes firsthand. Shortly after launching her business in 2019, she found herself facing a sudden 25% tariff on the high-end audio and video accessories her company imported from China. What began as a promising venture quickly turned into a financial struggle. The additional costs, which previously did not exist, threatened the survival of her business.

The existing tariff system greatly affects a variety of electronic products, such as smartphones, tablets, laptops, and video game consoles, many of which are primarily manufactured in China. As reported by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), China continues to be the leading supplier of electronics to the U.S., with imports reaching $146 billion as recently as 2023. This comprises 78% of smartphones, 79% of laptops and tablets, and almost 87% of video game consoles entering the American market.

The economic impact of these tariffs is placed squarely on U.S. importers, not the Chinese manufacturers, resulting in American businesses and consumers bearing the financial strain. Ed Brzytwa, the CTA’s vice president of international trade, highlights that these extra costs frequently reach consumers as increased prices. For businesses with tight profit margins, transferring these expenses to customers becomes an inevitable step.

Stores such as Best Buy have already cautioned about the repercussions. CEO Corie Barry recently mentioned that most of the added costs from tariffs would probably translate to higher prices for consumers. Likewise, tech producers like Acer and HP have announced intentions to increase their product prices, pointing to the financial burden resulting from the trade policies.

Although some companies have looked for other manufacturing options outside of China, moving supply chains to places like Vietnam, Thailand, and India, these changes are neither swift nor inexpensive. Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, notes that creating new supplier connections requires time and significant investment. Moreover, only a few countries provide the same level of scale and expertise as China, which continues to be a key player in global tech manufacturing.

The tariffs are included in a larger effort by the Trump administration to tackle trade imbalances, boost domestic production, and decrease the influx of illegal drugs and migrants into the United States. However, these policies have provoked countermeasures from major trading partners, like Canada, Mexico, and China, intensifying tensions and complicating global trade relationships.

Domestic production in the U.S. has seen slight growth due to these tariffs, with firms such as Apple increasing manufacturing in India and Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC expanding to Arizona. Despite these initiatives, the move towards local manufacturing encounters obstacles, including elevated operational expenses and strict regulations.

For smaller enterprises such as Austere, the lasting effects of these tariffs are a major worry. Ghazarian considers the option of increasing prices to counteract expenses but is concerned about the potential to drive away customers in an already challenging economic landscape. “Customers have a threshold for what they consider worth paying for,” she notes. “Exceeding that limit means we might lose them altogether, particularly with inflation already squeezing household finances.”

For smaller businesses like Austere, the long-term consequences of these tariffs remain a primary concern. Ghazarian acknowledges the possibility of raising prices to offset costs but worries about alienating customers in an already strained economic environment. “There’s a limit to what customers are willing to pay for perceived value,” she says. “If we go beyond that, we risk losing them entirely, especially with inflation already tightening household budgets.”

The possibility of an economic downturn in the U.S. introduces an additional layer of complexity. Should growth slow, the administration might revisit its tariff strategy to prevent further economic harm. For the moment, though, the likelihood of relaxing trade barriers seems minimal, as Trump has indicated intentions to raise tariffs on Chinese products even further and expand duties to additional countries.

The effects of these policies reach beyond the United States. Should Chinese manufacturers move production to nations with elevated labor costs, worldwide prices for technology products might increase. Moreover, retaliatory tariffs from other countries could hinder the flow of U.S. technology exports, putting additional pressure on the industry.

Despite these obstacles, Ghazarian is resolute in her efforts to adjust. By building up inventory prior to the latest tariff implementations, she has managed to secure temporary respite to endure the challenging period. Looking forward, she is investigating ways to reduce expenses and exploring alternative production techniques to keep her business running. “I had hoped to concentrate on growth and innovation, but unfortunately, much of my time is dedicated to strategies for survival,” she laments.

Despite these challenges, Ghazarian remains determined to adapt. By stockpiling inventory before the latest tariffs went into effect, she has gained temporary relief to weather the storm. Looking ahead, she is exploring cost-cutting measures and alternative production methods to keep her business afloat. “I had hoped to focus on growth and innovation, but instead, so much of my time is spent on survival strategies,” she laments.

The ongoing trade war underscores the delicate balance between economic policy and its unintended consequences. While the administration’s tariffs aim to achieve broader geopolitical goals, they have created ripple effects that reverberate through industries and households alike. For U.S. tech firms, the road ahead will require resilience, adaptability, and a willingness to navigate an increasingly uncertain global trade landscape.

By Ava Martinez

You may also like

  • Market Economies Explained

  • Delving into the Underground Economy

  • Defining Human Capital in Modern Economics

  • Key Concepts of Economic Externalities